The Digital Public Library of America has announced a “beta sprint” for envisioning in software (or a sketch of software) what the DPLA could be.
Here are some more short interviews with folks who attended the Digital Public Library of America meeting in Amsterdam.
Stefan Gradmann (humbold Universitaet) on libraries after books become mere temporary configurations of small pieces:
Doron Weber of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation on his hopes for the DPLA:
Chris Freeland of the Biodiversity Heritage Library on supporting collaborative scientists:
Here are two podcasts from the DPLA meeting in Amsterdam this week. Jonathan Rothman of the HathiTrust and Paola Mazzucchi of Arrow talk about their projects for identifying the copyright holders of “orphaned works,” i.e., works that are in copyright whose copyright holders are not known and/or findable.
I’ll post more interviews tomorrow.
A good to read piece that must surely be making the rounds in library circles:
Also happy because it rose to my attention (#20 right now) on Hacker News — seems “hackers” are interested in library’s too ; )
There’s a lot of talk about what the future of publishing looks like. Designers and innovators draw up these artistic visualizations of tablets, touchscreens, and interactive multimedia literature mashups to illustrate the possibilities.
But one designer is thinking a lot more about what is lost in the transition from the physical book to the digital. In fact, his visualizations often flip the script by placing digital literature in the physical context.
James Bridle is an editor, publisher, designer, and innovator. One of his most recent projects was a physical production of the complete changelogs from the Wikipedia entry on the Iraq War. The project amounted to twelve volumes of almost 7,000 pages, including all the changes, discussions, and arguments logged in the process of producing the never-complete Wikipedia article from December 2004 to November 2009.
He’s created a number of other projects to highlight the impermanence of the web and provoke conversation on the e-book, both the efficiencies and deficiencies thereof. The Harvard Library Innovation Lab’s very own David Weinberger spoke with James by Skype about his work for the first ever episode of Library Lab/The Podcast.
Subscribe to the RSS of the LibraryLab podcast here to stay updated on upcoming episodes!
Subscribe to us in iTunesU
Creative Commons music courtesy of Brad Sucks
Here’s a surprisingly touching video from Jon Voss, touting the power of metadata:
I say “surprisingly touching” because it is about metadata, after all.
Mathew Ingram at Gigaom reports on one of the catches in Amazon’s plan to allow libraries to lend e-books on the Kindle: Who owns the books? Since preserving our heritage is one of the key value of our libraries but not of Amazon, there are troubling consequences of turning libraries into distribution sites for corporate content.
I have heard a well-known Internet librarian (I’m keeping her/his name confidential because I didn’t ask if I’m allowed to repeat and attribute this idea, although I’m 99% certain this person wouldn’t mind) suggest that the way forward is for libraries to push to be allowed to buy e-books. But apparently buying and owning stuff is a crazy idea in the Age of the